Most organizations assume remediation reduces risk.
It’s a reasonable assumption. A vulnerability is identified, a patch is applied, the scanner comes back clean, and the ticket is closed. The workflow is complete, the metrics improve, and the issue is considered resolved.
The problem is that attackers don’t care about remediation workflows. They care about outcomes.
A scanner may no longer report the vulnerability, but those activities do not matter if an attacker can still achieve the same objective through the same attack path, excessive privileges, or a different weakness that was never addressed in the first place.
Many security programs measure whether work was completed, but they don’...