
Your orchestration framework choice is a security decision, not just an engineering one
Comparisons of LangChain, CrewAI and AutoGen are easy to find — dozens of guides this year cover the same ground: developer experience, ecosystem maturity, how easy it is to wire up multi-agent workflows. None of them ask the question I actually care about: does the framework you pick change how easily your agent gets compromised?
I ran the test. The answer is yes, by a wide margin, and it’s not something I’ve seen reflected in the public comparison guides.
A quick definition, since this matters for what follows: an orchestration framework is the software layer that sits between the underlying AI model and the outside world — it decides how the agent plans its steps, when it calls a tool or ...